US District Court for the Eastern District of California Other Statutes Cases

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 338
RSS Feed | View as table
County of Madera, A Political Subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022at00845
Plaintiff: County of Madera, A Political Subdivision of the State of California and The People of the State of California, Acting By And Through The County Of Madera
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Amador et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01917
Plaintiff: County of Amador
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Butte et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01912
Plaintiff: County of Butte, County of Lassen, County of Sacramento and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Trinity et al,. v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01905
Plaintiff: County of Trinity and The People of the State of California
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Calaveras, et al. v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01370
Plaintiff: County of Calaveras, County of Fresno and County of Mariposa
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, a political subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022at00842
Plaintiff: COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, a political subdivision of the State of California, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, COUNTY OF FRESNO, a political subdivision of the State of California and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2022at01082
Plaintiff: COUNTY OF BUTTE, a political subdivision of the State of California, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF BUTTE, COUNTY OF LASSEN, a political subdivision of the State of California and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Inyo et al v. McKinsey and Company, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01340
Plaintiff: County of Inyo, County of Merced and County of Tuolumne
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of El Dorado et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01876
Plaintiff: County of El Dorado, County of Glenn, County of Modoc and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PS) Young v. Burlingham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01712
Plaintiff: Daniel Christopher Young
Defendant: Steven Richard Burlingham, Gregory Ralph Beyer, David Louis Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?