US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 152,680
In re The Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland
as 3:2024cv00711
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland
as 3:2024cv00709
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation et al v. Cammack et al
as 3:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation and Peerless Insurance Company
Defendant:
Richard Cammack doing business as Contra Costa Ballet and Jane WK Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Fingal-Surma et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv01675
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fingal-Surma and Laura Fingal-Surma
Defendant:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Czyszczon v. Jumio, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01677
Plaintiff:
Jacob Czyszczon
Defendant:
Jumio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mesimer v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv01625
Plaintiff:
Norma Mesimer
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. 23andMe, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Brown
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Prescott v. Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Emarieay Prescott
Defendant:
Contra Costa County and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.