Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Torts - Property - Other Personal Property Damage Cases filed in the California Northern District Court before Samuel Conti [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 6 of 6
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
July 10, 2009
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al v. Colma Drayage, Inc et al CA Northern Conti Other Personal Property Damage Sherman-Clayton Act
Plaintiff: Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Marinpak MPK Sonoma, Inc Defendant: Colma Drayage, Inc, Devincenzi Trucking, Inc, Fredrick Shumate
 
March 25, 2009
Diaz et al v. Asuncion et al CA Northern Conti Other Personal Property Damage Diversity
Plaintiff: Lori Diaz, Retha Wetter; Defendant: Lawrence Asuncion, Walter Kolbe, Richard Wiewiorka, Martin Lettunich, Stefan Matan
 
August 7, 2008
Bennett v. Hosting.com CA Northern Conti Other Personal Property Damage Federal Question
Plaintiff: Catherine Bennett; Defendant: Hosting.com
 
April 28, 2006
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc v. Genentech Inc CA Northern Conti Other Personal Property Damage Diversity-Personal Injury
October 6, 2005
SP Aviation, Inc v. Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation Inc CA Northern Conti Other Personal Property Damage Diversity-Personal Injury
November 15, 2002
Reudy et al v. Clearchannel Outdoor, Inc. CA Northern Conti Other Personal Property Damage Diversity-Property Damage
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.