Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Federal Tax Suits Cases filed in the California Northern District Court before Jeremy Fogel

Browse by Type of Federal Tax Suits Lawsuit

 



Federal Tax Suits Cases filed in the California Northern District Court before Jeremy Fogel [ Court Info ]
Results 1 - 17 of 17
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
June 26, 2009
Hewlett-Packard Company, and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. United States of America CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Refund of Income Tax Penalty
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company, and Consolidated Subsidiaries, Hewlett-Packard Company, and Consolidated Subsidiaries, Hewlett-Packard Company, and Consolidated Subsidiaries Defendant: United States of America
 
February 3, 2009
United States of America et al v. Barnett CA Northern Whyte Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff: United States of America, Cheerlen Chang; Defendant: Neal Barnett
 
June 14, 2007
Seidel v. United States of America
court opinions & orders
CA Northern Whyte Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Plaintiff: Vicki R. Seidel; Defendant: United States of America
 
April 17, 2007
United States Of America v. Lighthouse Capital Corporation CA Northern Lloyd Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff: United States Of America; Defendant: Lighthouse Capital Corporation
 
February 1, 2007
Wales v. World Funding Corporation et al CA Northern Fogel IRS-Third Party IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Plaintiff: Diane Wales; Defendant: World Funding Corporation, Mykal S. Ryan, Ajeenah Crittendon
 
October 25, 2006
Huch v. United States Of America CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Refund Excise Tax
July 19, 2006
United States Of America et al v. Ong CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
June 12, 2006
United States of America et al v. Landon
court opinions & orders
CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
May 19, 2006
Cena et al v. United States Of America CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) Recovery of IRS Tax
United States Of America et al v. Pietz
court opinions & orders
CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
April 6, 2006
Ram R. Swamy v. United States of America, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Refund Taxes
December 16, 2005
United States of America et al v. Wuerth CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
March 1, 2005
Johnson v. Department of Child Support Modesto, California et al CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) Petition for Removal
February 18, 2005
United States of America v. Prakasam et al CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
December 29, 2004
Media v. United States of America , Department of Treasury by its agency, Internal Revenue Service CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Tax Liability
September 28, 2004
United States of America et al v. Robbins CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
April 7, 2004
Roberts v. Internal Revenue Service CA Northern Fogel Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) IRS: Tax Liability
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.