US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 153,328
Syndio Solutions, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02316
Plaintiff:
Syndio Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hurst v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Inc
as 4:2024cv02314
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hurst
Defendant:
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Mattatall v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mattatall
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bailey v. Borda
as 3:2024cv02307
Petitioner:
Jasper W. Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Ron E. Borda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Du v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv02317
Plaintiff:
Yanping Du
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Haptic, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
Haptic, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. City Of Oakland
as 3:2024cv02311
Plaintiff:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
City Of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
