Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the California Southern District Court before Jeffrey T. Miller

Browse by Type of Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuit

 



Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the California Southern District Court before Jeffrey T. Miller [ Court Info ]
Results 1 - 27 of 27
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
November 10, 2009
United States of America v. Currency US 41,487.00 CA Southern Miller Other Fed. Question
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: Currency US 41,487.00
 
October 8, 2009
United States of America v. One Glock GMBH 9 Caliber 19 Pistol, Serial No. BFD862US CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: One Glock GMBH 9 Caliber 19 Pistol, Serial No. BFD862US
 
July 10, 2009
v. United States of America CA Southern Miller Other Fed. Question
Movant: In the matter of the seizure of all funds on Deposit at Union Bank, N.A., In San Diego, California, Account Services Corporation Respondent: United States of America
 
June 11, 2009
United States of America v. $14,300.00 in U.S. Currency CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $14,300.00 in U.S. Currency
 
April 28, 2009
United States of America v. One 1996 Dina Commercial Bus CA License No. 8J00962, VIN 3ABBBFHA9S001120 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: One 1996 Dina Commercial Bus CA License No. 8J00962, VIN 3ABBBFHA9S001120
 
April 16, 2009
United States of America v. Cadillac 2003 Escalade, CA License No. 5BSX614, VIN 1GYEC63T83R220020 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: Cadillac 2003 Escalade, CA License No. 5BSX614, VIN 1GYEC63T83R220020
 
September 17, 2008
v. United States of America CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property U.S. Government Defendant
Defendant: United States of AmericaMovant: Mitchell Margaretich
 
August 13, 2008
United States of America v. $16,871.00 in U.S. Currency CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: $16,871.00 in U.S. Currency
 
August 5, 2008
United States of America v. $36,208.00 in U.S. Currency CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: $36,208.00 in U.S. Currency
 
June 25, 2008
United States of America v. Kenworth 1999 W900 Tractor, CA License No. 9D53724, Vin 1XKWDB9X5XJ825034 et al CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: Kenworth 1999 W900 Tractor, CA License No. 9D53724, Vin 1XKWDB9X5XJ825034, Wabash 1994 National RCA-102-15 Trailer, AZ License No. L87023, Vin 1JJV482S8RL206936
 
March 26, 2008
Macias v. United States of America CA Southern Miller Other U.S. Government Defendant
Petitioner: Benjamin Macias, Respondent: United States of America
 
February 4, 2008
Venskus v. United States of America CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Petitioner: Seth Venskus, Respondent: United States of America
 
October 10, 2007
United States of America v. $23,722.00 in U.S. Currency et al
court opinions & orders
CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: $23,722.00 in U.S. Currency, $10,122.00 in U.S. Currency, 2005 Dodge Ram 3500 Pickup
 
March 23, 2007
United States of America v. Currency US $31,950.00 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: Currency US $31,950.00
 
December 4, 2006
United States of America v. $90,000.00 in U.S. Currency et al CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
November 6, 2006
United States of America v. $29,490.00 in U.S. Currency CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
October 5, 2006
USA v. Nine Assorted Money Orders Totaling $8,500.00 et al CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
August 28, 2006
USA v. Currency US $20000 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
June 28, 2006
Ortega v. USA CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
May 30, 2006
USA v. Currency US $5000 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
April 25, 2006
USA v. Currency US $3100 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
April 13, 2005
USA v. Three Commingled CA Southern Miller Other Food & Drug Foreclosure
April 4, 2005
USA v. Currency US $193739, et al CA Southern Miller Other Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. Currency US $63550 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
December 27, 2004
USA v. Currency US $36796 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
December 13, 2004
USA v. 1992 Ford F350 CA Southern Miller Other Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
September 10, 2004
USA v. Currency US $13599 CA Southern Miller Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.