Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Torts - Property - Other Fraud Cases filed in the California Southern District Court before Janis L. Sammartino [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 19, 2009
Hammes Company Healthcare, LLC et al v. Tri-City Healthcare District et al CA Southern Sammartino Other Fraud Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff: Hammes Company Healthcare, LLC, HC Tri-City I, LLC Defendant: Tri-City Healthcare District, Larry Anderson, Pamela Smith, DOES
 
September 23, 2009
Smith v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company et al CA Southern Sammartino Other Fraud Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff: Edward Smith Defendant: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company, Richard Syron, Richard Syron, Patricia L. Cook, Patricia L. Cook and others...
 
September 17, 2009
Molina v. Apple, Inc. et al CA Southern Sammartino Other Fraud Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff: Arturo Molina Defendant: Apple, Inc., AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
 
October 3, 2008
Priority Pharmacy, Inc. v. Universal Settlements International, Inc. et al CA Southern Sammartino Other Fraud Diversity
Plaintiff: Priority Pharmacy, Inc.; Defendant: Universal Settlements International, Inc., DOES
 
May 8, 2008
Sintsirmas v. Biometrics International, Inc. CA Southern Sammartino Other Fraud Diversity
Plaintiff: Eugenia Sintsirmas; Defendant: Biometrics International, Inc.
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.