Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and



Civil Rights - Employment Cases filed in the Connecticut District Court [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 50 of over 1,300
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
December 10, 2009
CT Droney Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
December 8, 2009
CT Dorsey Employment No cause code entered
 
December 7, 2009
CT Hall Employment No cause code entered
 
CT Thompson Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
December 1, 2009
CT Dorsey Employment Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
 
CT Arterton Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
November 24, 2009
CT Bryant Employment No cause code entered
 
November 20, 2009
CT Chatigny Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
November 19, 2009
CT Underhill Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Kravitz Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Bryant Employment No cause code entered
 
November 18, 2009
CT Droney Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
November 13, 2009
CT Arterton Employment Violation of Civil Rights
 
CT Underhill Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
November 12, 2009
CT Arterton Employment Family & Medical Leave Act
 
November 10, 2009
CT Kravitz Employment No cause code entered
 
November 9, 2009
CT Garfinkel Employment No cause code entered
 
November 6, 2009
CT Kravitz Employment Job Discrimination (Age)
 
November 3, 2009
CT Bryant Employment Diversity-Employment Discrimination
 
November 2, 2009
CT Kravitz Employment Diversity-Employment Discrimination
 
October 23, 2009
CT Underhill Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
October 22, 2009
CT Kravitz Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
October 16, 2009
CT Haight, Jr. Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
October 15, 2009
CT Haight, Jr. Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Underhill Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Bryant Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Eginton Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
October 14, 2009
CT Dorsey Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Arterton Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Underhill Employment Civil Rights Act
 
CT Eginton Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Kravitz Employment Civil Rights
 
October 9, 2009
CT Hall Employment No cause code entered
 
October 8, 2009
CT Dorsey Employment Job Discrimination (Race)
 
CT Arterton Employment Americans with Disabilities Act
 
October 7, 2009
CT Droney Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
October 6, 2009
CT Dorsey Employment No cause code entered
 
October 5, 2009
CT Droney Employment No cause code entered
 
October 1, 2009
CT Eginton Employment No cause code entered
 
September 29, 2009
CT Martinez Employment No cause code entered
 
CT Droney Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
September 28, 2009
CT Hall Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Kravitz Employment No cause code entered
 
September 25, 2009
CT Dorsey Employment Job Discrimination (Employment)
 
CT Chatigny Employment Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
 
September 22, 2009
CT Martinez Employment No cause code entered
 
September 18, 2009
CT Arterton Employment Diversity-Employment Discrimination
 
CT Martinez Employment No cause code entered
 
September 17, 2009
CT Dorsey Employment Job Discrimination (Age)
 
September 15, 2009
CT Haight, Jr. Employment No cause code entered
 
        Next >
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.