Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,419
Kerwick v. Pullman & Comley LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Ms. Colleen Mary-Elaine Kerwick
Defendant:
Pullman & Comley LLC, State of Connecticut, Kenneth D. Savino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Kerwick v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Colleen Ni Chairmhaic (Colleen Kerwick)
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Pullman & Comley, Kenneth Savino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Chounlamontry v. Shorttall et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mike Chounlamontry
Defendant:
Joseph M. Shorttall d/b/a Judge and Stan Moskowitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rajkarnikar v. US Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Nirjala Rajkarnikar
Defendant:
US Attorney's Office, David Azia, US Attorneys and others
Mair v. Milford Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Debbie Mair
Defendant:
Milford Police Department, Noss Steven and Williams Barbour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Aaron v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Paul Aaron
Defendant:
USA, John H. Garcia, Amos D. Telo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fagan v. Mcllquham
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Isobel M. Fagan
Defendant:
Craig Mcllquham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
