Intellectual Property Cases filed in the District Of Columbia District Court before Rosemary M. Collyer
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: District of Columbia Intellectual Property Lawyers
Intellectual Property Cases filed in the District Of Columbia District Court before Rosemary M. Collyer
Results 1 - 26 of 26
| Parties | District Court | Judge | Type of Lawsuit | Cause of Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 23, 2009 | ||||
| BIOGEN IDEC MA INC v. DOLL | DC | Collyer | Patent | Administrative Procedure Act |
|
Plaintiff: BIOGEN IDEC MA INC Defendant: JOHN J. DOLL
|
||||
| March 18, 2009 | ||||
| PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG v. SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD. et al | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA
CORPORATION
|
||||
| November 3, 2008 | ||||
| HTC CORPORATION et al v. IPCOM GMBH & CO., KG | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC.; Defendant: IPCOM GMBH & CO., KG
|
||||
| August 18, 2008 | ||||
| KONICA-MINOLTA PHOTO IMAGING, INC. v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO., KG | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: KONICA-MINOLTA PHOTO IMAGING, INC.; Defendant: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO., KG
|
||||
| August 13, 2008 | ||||
| PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG V. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
|
||||
| PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG V. KONICA-MINOLTA HOLDINGS INC. ET AL | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: KONICA-MINOLTA HOLDINGS INC., KONICA-MINOLTA
BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC..
|
||||
| PAPST LICENSING GMBH& CO. KG V. SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD. ET AL | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA
CORPORATION
|
||||
| PAPST. KG V. CANNON, INC., ET AL. | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: CANON, INC., CANON USA, INC.Counter Claimant: CANON, INC., CANON USA, INC., Counter Defendant: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
|
||||
| June 9, 2008 | ||||
| Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Nikon Corporation et al | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON AMERICAS, INC., NIKON,
INC.Counter Claimant: NIKON, INC., NIKON CORPORATION, Counter Defendant: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO.
KG
|
||||
| May 20, 2008 | ||||
| HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG | DC | Collyer | Patent | Federal Question |
|
Plaintiff: HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY; Defendant: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
|
||||
| April 9, 2008 | ||||
| PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG v. RICOH COMPANY, LTD. et al | DC | Collyer | Patent | Declaratory Judgement |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: RICOH COMPANY, LTD., RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION,
RICOH CORPORATION
|
||||
| November 16, 2007 | ||||
| IN RE: PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA PATENT LITIGATION - MDL 1880 | DC | Collyer | Patent | Patent Infringement |
|
Plaintiff: CASIO INC, FUJIFILM CORPORATION, PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: OLYMPUS CORP.,
FUJIFILM CORPORATION, SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
|
||||
| PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG v. FUJIFILM CORPORATION | DC | Collyer | Patent | Patent Infringement |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: FUJIFILM CORPORATION
|
||||
| PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG v. OLYMPUS CORP. | DC | Collyer | Patent | Patent Infringement |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: OLYMPUS CORP.
|
||||
| PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG v. SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO. | DC | Collyer | Patent | Patent Infringement |
|
Plaintiff: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG; Defendant: SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO.
|
||||
| July 10, 2007 | ||||
| HEMPHILL v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al | District Of Columbia | Bates | Patent | Patent Infringement |
|
Plaintiff: ALLEGRA D. HEMPHILL; Defendant: KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY
|
||||
| May 24, 2007 | ||||
| CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL v. ALICE CORPORATION PTY. LTD. | District Of Columbia | Collyer | Patent | Patent Infringement |
|
Plaintiff: CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL; Defendant: ALICE CORPORATION PTY. LTD.
|
||||
| March 14, 2007 | ||||
| AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS v. RASHAD UNIVERSITY, INC. et al | DC | Collyer | Copyrights | Copyright Infringement |
|
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS; Defendant: RASHAD UNIVERSITY, INC., RASHAD INTERNET
UNIVERSITY, NABIL RASHAD
|
||||
| November 21, 2006 | ||||
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. v. DEREK & JAMAR PRODUCTION,
LLC
|
District Of Columbia | Collyer | Trademark | Fed. Question: Trademark |
|
Plaintiff: DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC.; Defendant: DEREK & JAMAR PRODUCTION, LLC
|
||||
| October 13, 2006 | ||||
| CARTIER v. WING HON METAL MANUFACTORY LTD. | District Of Columbia | Collyer | Patent | Declaratory Judgement |
| January 10, 2006 | ||||
| UNITRONICS 1989 R G LTD., et al v. GHARB | District Of Columbia | Collyer | Patent | Patent Infringement |
| October 20, 2005 | ||||
| BLACKSIDE, INC. v. ARRINGTON | District Of Columbia | Collyer | Copyrights | Copyright Infringement |
| February 28, 2005 | ||||
| ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC. et al v. DOES | District Of Columbia | Collyer | Copyrights | Copyright Infringement |
| October 28, 2004 | ||||
| SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT et al v. BROCKENBROUGH | District Of Columbia | Collyer | Copyrights | Copyright Infringement |
| September 30, 2004 | ||||
| WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. et al v. DOE | District Of Columbia | Collyer | Copyrights | Copyright Infringement |
| January 12, 2004 | ||||
| WB MUSIC CORP. et al v. GWYNN et al | District Of Columbia | Collyer | Copyrights | Copyright Infringement |
Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Includes court opinions & orders.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should
not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Copyright © Justia :: Company :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Contact Us :: Have a Happy Day!