Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

P. Petitions - Civil Rights Cases filed in the District Of Columbia District Court before John Garrett Penn

Results 1 - 9 of 9
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
March 8, 2006
LONGUS v. WYNN et al District Of Columbia Penn Civil Rights Freedom of Information Act
December 14, 2005
SHARBUTT v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES et al District Of Columbia Penn Civil Rights Freedom of Information Act
November 17, 2005
BEY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE District Of Columbia Penn Civil Rights Freedom of Information Act
May 27, 2005
LEWIS-BEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE District Of Columbia Penn Civil Rights Freedom of Information Act
March 30, 2005
MELVILLE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE District Of Columbia Penn Civil Rights Freedom of Information Act
January 12, 2005
CARTER v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES District Of Columbia Penn Civil Rights Freedom of Information Act
December 30, 2004
MASTERS v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES District Of Columbia Penn Civil Rights Freedom of Information Act
April 26, 2004
STUART v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DC Penn Civil Rights Freedom of Information Act
April 22, 2004
LONGUS v. COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDERS SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DC Penn Civil Rights Right to Privacy Act
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.