Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Trademark Cases filed in the District Of Columbia District Court before Richard W. Roberts

Results 1 - 6 of 6
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 26, 2009
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SERVIN et al DC Roberts Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant: JACQUES SERVIN, IGOR VAMOS, SUPPORT AND COMMITMENT, INC., DAVID SIEVERS, MORGAN GOODWIN and others...
 
June 17, 2009
PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INC. v. MONCRIEF et al DC Roberts Trademark Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff: PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INC. Defendant: ASHAWNITA MONCRIEF, JOHN DOE
 
September 18, 2008
ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION v. PRODIGY PARTNERS LTD., INC. DC Roberts Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION; Defendant: PRODIGY PARTNERS LTD., INC.
 
January 12, 2006
ROLL CALL, INC. v. ROLL CALL STRATEGIES, LLC District Of Columbia Roberts Trademark Trademark Infringement
November 10, 2005
INPHONIC, INC. v. EDWAN District Of Columbia Roberts Trademark Fed. Question: Trademark
September 21, 2005
TANNAS et al v. BAE SYSTEMS AVIONICS LIMITED et al DC Roberts Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.