US District Court for the District of Columbia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,797
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00579
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PETWAY v. TRANSUNION
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
JACQULINE PETWAY
Defendant:
TRANSUNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC
Defendant:
CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
as 1:2024mc00034
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
SHABAZZ v. D.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES VETERANS PROGRAM
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
KWAME L. SHABAZZ
Defendant:
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES VETERANS PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. et al
as 1:2024mc00031
Petitioner:
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
Respondent:
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
Gergler v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jason R Gergler
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
IN RE CERTAIN ELECTRONIC COMPUTING DEVICES AND COMPONENTS THEREOF et al v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
as 1:2024mc00030
Not Yet Classified:
CERTAIN ELECTRONIC COMPUTING DEVICES AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
Petitioner:
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
Respondent:
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
