District of Columbia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 9,797
Braun v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Braun
Not Yet Classified:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Michael whitaker, Susan Northrup, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OM v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA OM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
CHAMBERS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
CARISSA CHAMBERS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
NAVAJO NATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
NAVAJO NATION
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND et al v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, ROBERT M. CALIFF and FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
MITCHELL v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
as 1:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
GERALD MITCHELL
Defendant:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR A FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00651
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR A FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ASHLEY 2160 LLC v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00842
Not Yet Classified:
ASHLEY 2160 LLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
