District of Columbia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 232
LOVELACE v. MEDSTAR HEALTH INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01193
Defendant:
LAURA S. JOHNSON, MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER, INC., MEDSTAR MEDICAL GROUP II, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LISA LOVELACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVELACE v. MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01174
Defendant:
LAURA S. JOHNSON, MEDSTAR MEDICAL GROUP II, LLC, MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LISA LOVELACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVELACE v. MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01154
Defendant:
LAURA S. JOHNSON, MEDSTAR MEDICAL GROUP II, LLC, MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LISA LOVELACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. HANSES et al
as 1:2019cv00392
Plaintiff:
RONALD PATTERSON
Defendant:
STEVEN HANSES and V.A. MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HIGGS et al v. PALMER et al
as 1:2018cv02356
Plaintiff:
GLADYS HIGGS, MELINDA JENKINS and VICTORIA HIGGS
Defendant:
MELANIE SCOTT-BOWLING, KHOSROW DAVACHI, RICHARD PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURT al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv01937
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. ALEXANDER and Dorene Hurt
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HUMMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv01816
Defendant:
DAN RATTRAY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LESTER L. HUMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
LOUVIERRE-RAMIREZ v. OSADA
as 1:2018cv01768
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY D LOUVIERRE-RAMIREZ and TIFFANY D. LOUVIERRE-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
DR. TATSUHIKO OSADA and TATSUHIKO OSADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
AFOLABI-BROWN v. COOMBS et al
as 1:2018cv01409
Plaintiff:
RICHARD O. AFOLABI-BROWN
Defendant:
ALBERT C. COOMBS, WASHINGTON DENTAL STUDIO, DC MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAROACH v. BRIDGEPOINT HEALTHCARE, LLC
as 1:2018cv01096
Plaintiff:
TORINA LAROACH
Defendant:
BRIDGEPOINT HEALTHCARE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
