District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 315
WILLIAMS et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv00890
Plaintiff:
RONALD IAN BOATRIGHT and THURMAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. BOOTH et al
as 1:2020cv00849
Defendant:
QUINCY L. BOOTH and LENNARD JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS, ERIC SMITH, D'ANGELO PHILLIPS and others
Petitioner:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS LABOR COMMITTEE
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
K.O. et al v. SESSIONS, III et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, JOHN DOE CBP AGENTS, JOHN DOE ORR PERSONNEL and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv03173
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARCIA, JR v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2019cv02368
Plaintiff:
ARTEMIO GARCIA, JR
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CASEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01852
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRISON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2019cv01838
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. MORRISON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DRIEVER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv01807
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ALL FBOP DIRECTORS OF PSYCHOLOGY SERVICES-NATIONWIDE, UNKNOWN PRISON EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE DRIEVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FARMER v. DISABILITY PROGRAM MANAGER et al
as 1:2019cv01731
Plaintiff:
DEE DEIDRE FARMER
Defendant:
DISABILITY PROGRAM MANAGER and ERIC EARWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
