US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,115
BURNS v. GOOLDIN et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE KAIN BURNS and KEVIN LEE
Defendant:
CHERYL GOOLDIN, JOHN GOOLDIN, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS v. AFFIRM HOLDINGS INC
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
DESTINEE MONET HARRIS
Defendant:
AFFIRM HOLDINGS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BECK v. ROBERT JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
SEAN BECK
Defendant:
ROBERT JOHNSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF SANTA ROSA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCARBOROUGH v. GAINEY et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joshua Scarborough
Defendant:
Sheriff EMERY GAINEY, Deputy Kaifa Tyson and Deputy Monica Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKENZIE v. JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POLLOCK v. GARLAND
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DANIC POLLOCK
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FOY v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
TEENA FOY
Defendant:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW and MELINDA N COONROD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. LEO
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
LAVETTE M WRIGHT
Defendant:
MAXIE WILLIAM LEO, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
