Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Georgia Northern District Court before Batten Sr

Browse by Type of Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuit

 



Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Georgia Northern District Court before Batten Sr [ Court Info ]
Results 1 - 12 of 12
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
May 21, 2009
United States of America v. $688,670.42 seized from Regions Bank Acct. xxxxxx5028 et al GA Northern Batten Other Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $688,670.42 seized from Regions Bank Acct. xxxxxx5028, $49,603.68 seized from Regions Bank Acct. xxxxxx5955 Claimant: PCPS Corporation, PCPS Corporation, Omar L. Toledo, Omar L. Toledo, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
 
March 19, 2009
United States of America v. $134,102.75 Seized From First State Bank Account XX3829 GA Northern Batten Other Search and Forfeiture of Monetary Instruments
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $134,102.75 Seized From First State Bank Account XX3829 Claimant: Kumar Atul Patel
 
February 26, 2009
United States of America v. $64,910.80 seized from Bank of America et al GA Northern Batten Other Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $64,910.80 seized from Bank of America, $23,401.26 seized from Bank of America
 
January 13, 2009
United States of America v. $302,599.00 in United States Currency GA Northern Batten Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $302,599.00 in United States Currency
 
January 9, 2009
United States of America v. $3,105.00 in United States Currency GA Northern Batten Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $3,105.00 in United States Currency
 
December 12, 2008
United States of America v. $50,000.00 in United States Currency GA Northern Batten Drug Related Seizure of Property
July 21, 2008
United States of America v. $14,698.00 in United States Currency GA Northern Batten Other Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $14,698.00 in United States Currency
 
June 10, 2008
United States of America v. $9,000.00 in United States Currency GA Northern Batten Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $9,000.00 in United States Currency
 
March 10, 2008
United States of America v. $11,565.00 in United States Currency GA Northern Batten Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $11,565.00 in United States Currency
 
November 19, 2007
United States of America v. $277,349.36 et al GA Northern Batten Other Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $277,349.36, $197,265.52, $1,845,963.30 and 14 KG of Gold
 
March 9, 2007
United States of America et al v. $105,278.63 Seized from First Intercontinental Bank, et al GA Northern Batten Other Search and Forfeiture of Monetary Instruments
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: $105,278.63 Seized from First Intercontinental Bank, $11,160.43 Seized from J.P. Morgan/Chase, $116,921.97 Seized from J.P. Morgan/Chase, $12,621.73 Seized from J.P. Morgan/Chase
 
November 28, 2005
United States of America v. $291,828.00 et al GA Northern Batten Drug Related Seizure of Property
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.