Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Copyrights Cases filed in the Georgia Northern District Court before Shoob [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
June 9, 2009
Imageline, Inc. v. Salem Communications Corporation et al GA Northern Shoob Other (820) Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Imageline, Inc., Imageline, Inc. Defendant: Salem Communications Corporation, Salem Communications Corporation, Oneplace, LLC, John Does 1-10
 
September 3, 2008
Kendrick v. Mauldin et al GA Northern Shoob Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Aika Kendrick Defendant: Jermaine Dupri Mauldin, So So Def Recordings, Inc., Delmar Arnaud, Virgin Records America, Inc.
 
January 9, 2007
Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. et al v. Jenkins GA Northern Shoob Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc., Arista Records LLC, BMG Music; Defendant: Carl Jenkins
 
August 19, 2005
Virgin Records America, Inc. et al v. Nissim GA Northern Shoob Copyrights
December 16, 2004
Caroline Records, Inc. et al v. Does 1-107 GA Northern Shoob Copyrights
November 16, 2004
Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Does 1 - 19 GA Northern Shoob Copyrights
April 28, 2004
Priority Records, et al v. Does 1-9 GA Northern Shoob Copyrights
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.