US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 16,760
Turner v. Comcast et al
as 1:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Comcast, Jesse Heurta, jennifer_khoury@comcast.com and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Middlebrooks v. Patterson et al
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Lillie M. Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Leigh Patterson and Emily Harsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Cordero Riley
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Labat
as 1:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee, III
Defendant:
Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Gold Creek Foods, LLC et al v. City of Dawsonville, Georgia et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gold Creek Foods, LLC and Gold Creek Processing, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dawsonville, Georgia, John Walden, Caleb Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
