Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Forfeiture / Penalty - Agriculture Cases filed in Georgia

Browse by Court

 



Forfeiture / Penalty - Agriculture Cases filed in Georgia
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
February 2, 2007
United States Of America v. 1826.34 Cubic Meters, More or Less, Of Big Leaf Mahogany Imported From Belgium GA Southern Moore Agriculture Endangered Species Act
Plaintiff: United States Of America; Defendant: 1826.34 Cubic Meters, More or Less, Of Big Leaf Mahogany Imported From Belgium
 
January 26, 2007
United States of America v. 10 Drums of Hoodia Extract Imported from the People's Republic of China GA Northern Martin Agriculture Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: 10 Drums of Hoodia Extract Imported from the People's Republic of ChinaClaimant: Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 
United States of America v. 40 Drums of Hoodia Extract Imported from the People's Republic of China GA Northern Pannell Agriculture Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: 40 Drums of Hoodia Extract Imported from the People's Republic of China
 
May 31, 2005
Department of Agriculture, State of Georgia v. Bragg Farms, Inc. GA Southern Edenfield Agriculture Trademark Infringement
October 26, 2004
United States v. 43.444 Cubic GA Southern Moore Agriculture Complaint for Forfeiture
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.