Guam Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Pierce et al v. Obama et al
as 1:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Seavou Pierce, California Prisoners and U.S. Prisoners
Defendant:
Barack Obama, United States, Fernando Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Soto v. Rapadas
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Alexander Soto
Defendant:
Leonardo M. Rapadas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ignacio v. People of Guam
as 1:2013cv00002
Petitioner:
Francisco San Agustin Ignacio
Defendant:
People of Guam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 1:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
U.S. Secretary of Defense, U.S. Secretary of State, President of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pangelinan v. San Agustin
as 1:2012cv00006
Petitioner:
Frank Edward Pangelinan
Respondent:
Jose A. San Agustin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glory v. Sanders
as 1:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
Rexielito J. Glory
Defendant:
Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demos v. The State of Washington et al
as 1:2009cv00024
Petitioner:
John R. Demos, Jr
Respondent:
The State of Washington and The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shinohara v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Gil A. Shinohara
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ignacio v. People of Guam
as 1:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
Francisco S.A. Ignacio
Defendant:
People of Guam
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alaimalo v. United States et al
as 1:2008cv00003
Petitioner:
Vaatausili Mark Alaimalo
Respondent:
United States and J.L. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
