Hawaii Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Dicks et al v. Hawaii Republican Party, et al et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Karl Orlando Dicks, James Ryan Malish and Daniel Decker
Defendant:
Hawaii Republican Party, et al, Shirlene Ostrov, Lynne Finnegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Jean v. Nago
as 1:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Khistina De Jean
Defendant:
Scott Nago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dicks v. Schatz et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Karl Orlando Dicks
Defendant:
Brian Schatz, Calvin Say, Choon James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Nago et al
as 1:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Calvin C. Griffin
Defendant:
Scott Nago, State of Hawaii, Office of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pirtle v. Nago
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
James Pirtle
Defendant:
Scott Nago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dicks et al v. State of Hawaii Office of Elections et al
as 1:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Karl O. Dicks, James Ryan Malish and Calvin C. Griffin
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Office of Elections and State of Hawaii Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2020cv00454
Plaintiff:
Calvin Christopher Griffin
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Office of Elections and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reeves et al v. Nago et al
as 1:2020cv00433
Plaintiff:
Mr. Randall Jay Reeves, Mr. Ravinder Singh Nagi, Mr. Vicente Topasna Borja and others
Defendant:
Federal Voting Assistance Program, Mark Esper, David Beirne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2020cv00298
Plaintiff:
Calvin Christopher Griffin
Defendant:
State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
De Jean v. Nago
as 1:2020cv00280
Defendant:
Scott Nago
Plaintiff:
Khistina Caldwell De Jean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
