US District Court for the District of Idaho Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,894
Hudson v. Boise Police Department, et al.
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Chance Gardner Hudson
Defendant:
Boise Police Department, City of Boise and Wayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Cabana Inn, et al.
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Johnson
Defendant:
Cabana Inn and State Street Motel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Burnett v. Teton Prestress Concrete LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
David Burnett
Defendant:
Teton Prestress Concrete, LLC and Hal Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Selene et al v. Parklane Management Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ahniah Selene
Defendant:
Parklane Management Company, LLC, Parklane Idanha Associates, LLC, Idanha Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rodriguez v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Avorie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Officer Octavio Diaz, Officer Tyler Shropshire, Officer Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Terry v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Terry
Defendant:
Officer Octavio Diaz, Officer Hale, Officer French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.