Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,629
Quinones v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Kelly D Davis, Jason Davis and Alliance Title Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Anaya
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Davis Davis
Defendant:
C/O Anaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. F.B.O.P
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Ray
Respondent:
F.B.O.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinones v. Ponting, et al.
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Becky Ponting and Hanly Ponting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones v. Meskin
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Richard Meskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. AK Gang member
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Unknown First Name Stone
Defendant:
AK, gang member and I.M.S.I. Gang AK and SVC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Custer County, Idaho et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Mark Wilson
Defendant:
Custer County, Idaho, Custer County Public Defenders Office, Idaho State Public Defense Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones v. IDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Julian Quinones
Defendant:
IDOC, ISMI and Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Dowell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Devon Joseph Anderson
Defendant:
Ashley Dowell, Shane Saxton, Conley Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matuguina v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Brian John Matuguina
Respondent:
Warden Tyrell Davis, Boise Police, Ada Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
