US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 12,976
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Wexford Medical Services et al
as 3:2024cv50121
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rice
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Services and Dr. Rupa Maitra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Kuchen
as 1:2024cv02350
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Stevenson
Defendant:
Kuchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv50119
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Mr. Avery, Karen Smiddy, Mr. Bungard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Osborne et al
as 1:2024cv02323
Plaintiff:
Brad Johnson
Defendant:
Kennith Osborne, Lotoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv02325
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
K. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poore v. Lammer et al
as 3:2024cv50115
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Poore
Defendant:
Brian Lammer, Jenkins, Borden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McKinney v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50111
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Castanedo et al
as 3:2024cv50112
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee
Defendant:
Michael Castanedo, Samantha Rodriguez and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. Sankey et al
as 1:2024cv02246
Plaintiff:
Duane McClendon
Defendant:
Shaquille Sankey and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
