US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 287
Ambrosetti v. Oregon Catholic Press et al
as 3:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Oregon Catholic Press and Bernadette Farrell
Plaintiff:
Vincent A Ambrosetti and International Liturgy Publications
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tannenbaum v. The2Connect, LLC
as 3:2019cv00555
Defendant:
The2Connect, LLC and Th2Connect, LLC
Plaintiff:
Allan Tannenbaum
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Conn-Selmer Inc
as 3:2019cv00352
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Conn-Selmer Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Iwasaki v. Apollo Design Technology, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00094
Defendant:
Apollo Design Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rich Iwasaki
Not Yet Classified:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Design Basics LLC v. Van Prooyen Builders Inc
as 2:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Van Prooyen Builders, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bachner v. USA Halloween Planet Inc
as 1:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jeff Bachner
Defendant:
USA Halloween Planet, Inc. and USA Halloween Planet Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Design Basics, LLC et al v. Lifehouse Homes, LLC
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Lifehouse Homes, LLC and Lifehouse Homes LLC
Plaintiff:
Plan Pros, Inc., Design Basics, LLC, Plan Pros Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cunningham v. Montgomery & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Montgomery & Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Design Basics, LLC v. Blum Construction, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00465
Defendant:
Blum Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, LLC
Undetermined:
William A Baten
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Design Basics, LLC v. Tempest Homes LLC
as 4:2018cv00097
Defendant:
Tempest Homes LLC
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
