US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,765
Anthony v. Chromalox Inc
as 2:2020cv00202
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anthony
Defendant:
Chromalox Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sieber v. Danieli Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
AMBER SIEBER
Defendant:
DANIELI CORPORATION and DANIELI & C. OFFICINE MECCANICHE S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyle v. Medtronic USA et. al.
as 2:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Medtronic Integrated Health Solutions, LLC, Stephen Marchino and Medtronic USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nancy Boyle and Patrick Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ElQuesny et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Pilar ElQuesny and Mongy ElQuesny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00139
Plaintiff:
Brittany Brown
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rychlock v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00134
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Donna Rychlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pranger v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Pranger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evers v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00134
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Sara J Evers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00135
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Brent Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellet v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
John Ellet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.