Southern District of Indiana Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 30,100
BARNES v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH INC.
as 1:2015cv00819
Plaintiff: ALETA BARNES
Defendant: INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH INC.
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Race)
LANCASTER v. AVON PRODUCTS, INC
as 2:2015cv00148
Defendant: AVON PRODUCTS, INC
Plaintiff: JESSICA R. LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
JACKSON v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00147
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: ROBERT LAMAR JACKSON
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00146
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: ROBERT LAMAR JACKSON
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLASEN v. WALLACE
as 1:2015cv00818
Plaintiff: ROBERT JONATHAN CLASEN
Defendant: ELAINE MARIA WALLACE
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act
HINES v. CLEAN THE WORLD GLOBAL, LLC
as 1:2015cv00812
Defendant: CLEAN THE WORLD GLOBAL, LLC
Plaintiff: AMANDA M. HINES
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00811
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00813
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00071
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
PERRY v. TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
as 3:2015cv00072
Plaintiff: TOM PERRY
Defendant: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.