US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,039
ALVARADO v. SMOOT et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ISAAC ALVARADO
Defendant:
MATTHEW SMOOT and PRUITT TRUCKING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, TODD DUVALL and RICHARD CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
EARP et al v. PANNELL et al
as 1:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
HEATHER M. EARP and KATHLEEN BARDEN
Defendant:
RANDY A. PANNELL and CHAMPION CARGO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COE v. BLUME et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Donald Coe
Defendant:
Mark Blume and Hirschbach Motor Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FULLER v. SANDOVAL et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
DIANA FULLER
Defendant:
SERGIO SANDOVAL, SAN JOSE TRUCKING, INC and RUSH TRUCK LEASING, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
VAIL v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
SARA VAIL
Defendant:
MARCUS ADAMS and MAG CARRIERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THE ESTATE OF FRANKLIN LOGAN, DECEASED v. KEVIN MCISAAC SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF FRANKLIN LOGAN, DECEASED
Defendant:
KEVIN MCISAAC SERVICES, LLC and KEVIN MCISAAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WINDERS v. OLSEN
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINDERS
Defendant:
AMY OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DAVIS v. HASSAN et al
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
TANNER DAVIS
Defendant:
AHMED HASSAN and STATES TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WINDERS v. OLSEN
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINDERS
Defendant:
AMY OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
