US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 7,915
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00102
Petitioner: TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTON v. DANKS
as 3:2024cv00061
Petitioner: TYLER CAINE BARTON
Respondent: JONATHAN DANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DURHAM v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00538
Petitioner: DARRELL DURHAM
Respondent: EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. REAGEL
as 1:2024cv00511
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent: REAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOD v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00479
Petitioner: DERRICK HOOD, JR.
Respondent: PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FISCHER v. RUTLEDGE
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER ALLEN FISCHER
Defendant: JUSTIN RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TONEY v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner: ANGUS J. TONEY
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. HAYDEN
as 3:2024cv00048
Petitioner: DONALD R. WHITE, JR.
Respondent: MICHAEL J. HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GEE v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00409
Petitioner: DAMON T. GEE
Respondent: DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00399
Petitioner: BRITT SCOTT
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?