US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 7,918
GAUVIN v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00342
Petitioner: MICHELLE GAUVIN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOLFORD v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00062
Petitioner: MARK WOLFORD
Respondent: WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JACOBS v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00031
Petitioner: ANTHONY JACOBS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
as 1:2024cv00276
Petitioner: KENNETH SCOTT, III
Respondent: MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. RULE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00049
Petitioner: TERRANCE DEAN WHITE
Respondent: RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SIMMONS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00257
Petitioner: RICHARD E. SIMMONS
Respondent: TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIS v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00255
Petitioner: DENNIS D. WILLIS and WESLEY WILLIS
Respondent: DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEADOWS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner: TIMOTHY MEADOWS
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PITTMAN v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2024cv00042
Petitioner: STEVEN PITTMAN, JR.
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MASCHO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00241
Petitioner: ADRIAN MASCHO
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?