US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 70,824
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00546
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Younce v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff: Cleo Madison Younce
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sedgwick
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff: Denise Sedgwick
Defendant: Center Grove Community School Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff: ANTWAN RUSH
Defendant: PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and RACHELLE BROWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIGNUM, LLC et al v. INDIANAPOLIS ORGANIC LAWN CARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff: SIGNUM, LLC and NATURALAWN OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS ORGANIC LAWN CARE, INC., DONALD HARVEY, DEBORAH CASEY-HARVEY and others
WATSON v. INSTANT BRANDS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00540
Plaintiff: LAQUANA WATSON
Defendant: INSTANT BRANDS LLC, INSTANT BRANDS, INC. and CORELLE BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner: TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00101
Petitioner: TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00102
Petitioner: TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?