District of Indiana Social Security Cases

Disability Insurance Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 1,851
Koschmider Frederick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00126
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00204
Plaintiff: John G Buford
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Payne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2015cv00043
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Cynthia Payne
Miscellaneous_party: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JOHNSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00757
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: ELLIOTT L JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BELL v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00730
Plaintiff: DERRICK E BELL
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv00177
Plaintiff: Patrica Diaz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security, SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
RUSSELL v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00703
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: BRENDA L. RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
GILLUM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2015cv00711
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff: MARILYN "KURT" GILLUM
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STORM v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00689
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: MASON D STORM
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SMITH v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00690
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: ARLANA K SMITH
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.