District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 111,724
MID CENTRAL OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. H&H Construction Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
MID CENTRAL OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
H&H Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CLEMENTS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
TANYA CLEMENTS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GOMEZ v. MARSHALL ID # 44402
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
LUIS GOMEZ
Defendant:
L MARSHALL ID # 44402
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Northridge Condominium Assn Inc v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Northridge Condominium Assn Inc
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Suggs v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Suggs
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
COVINGTON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
RONALD COVINGTON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
TRIPLETT et al
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
DONNA TRIPLETT, COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WHITE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RENEE LYNN WHITE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
