Kansas Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Woodard v. BNSF Railway Company
as 6:2009cv01324
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Woodard
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Ast v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2009cv02519
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Ast and Robert Allen Ast
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Brown v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2009cv02392
Plaintiff:
Harlan Edward Brown, Jr. and Harlan Edward Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Young v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 2:2009cv02369
Plaintiff:
Clarence Samuel Young
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Gagliardo v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 5:2009cv04080
Plaintiff:
Frank G. Gagliardo
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
O'Neal v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2009cv02277
Plaintiff:
Martin E. O'Neal
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Ney v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2009cv02208
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ney and Kenneth Ney
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Hemker v. BNSF Railway Co.
as 2:2009cv02090
Plaintiff:
Fred Hemker
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fox v. Watco Companies, Inc.
as 2:2009cv02078
Plaintiff:
Jack G. Fox and Jack G. Fox
Defendant:
Watco Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anslover v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2008cv04150
Plaintiff:
John Anslover
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
