Kentucky Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 138
Summit Electronics LLC v. Levitation Arts, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00611
Plaintiff:
Summit Electronics LLC
Defendant:
Levitation Arts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Monticello Banking Company
as 6:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Monticello Banking Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Griffin Technology, Inc. v. KITEC, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Griffin Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
KITEC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RaceTech, LLC v. Kentucky Downs, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
RaceTech, LLC
Defendant:
Kentucky Downs, LLC and Encore Gaming, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Tempur-Pedic Management, LLC v. Banyan Licensing, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tempur-Pedic Management, LLC
Defendant:
Banyan Licensing, LLC and Contour Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Donselman et al v. Prim Hall Enterprises, Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Donnie Donselman and Bindery Innovations of Kentucky, LLC
Defendant:
Prim Hall Enterprises, Inc, John Prim, David Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
CandyRific, LLC v. Catanzaro
as 3:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
CandyRific, LLC
Defendant:
David Joseph Catanzaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Doss v. Spin Chill Corp
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Doss
Defendant:
Spin Chill Corp
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Beavers et al v. Riley Built, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00539
Plaintiff:
Brandon Beavers , Beavers Hoof Care Services, LLC and Extreme Chute Company, LLC
Defendant:
Riley Built, Inc. and William S. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ideal Products, Inc. v. Cherry Engineering, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
Ideal Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Cherry Engineering, Inc. and Christopher R. Cherry
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
