Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Browse by Judge

 



Torts - Injury - Motor Vehicle Cases filed in the Maine District Court [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 36 of 36
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
June 19, 2009
SHAW v. 500516 NB LTD et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity
June 11, 2009
CHARETTE v. JACKSON ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle U.S. Government Defendant
May 15, 2009
LEONARD v. YOUNG et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity
April 17, 2009
CEFALO et al v. MITCHELL ME SINGAL Motor Vehicle Diversity
April 16, 2009
DEMORANVILLE v. USA ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle U.S. Government Defendant
SHAW v. STEWART'S TRANSFER et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity
December 31, 2008
CLARK et al v. LANE ME HORNBY Motor Vehicle Diversity
December 5, 2008
LANDRY v. KELTIC TRANSPORTATION INC ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity
October 17, 2008
WING v. USA ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle U.S. Government Defendant
August 21, 2008
LEONE et al v. GHIKAS ME HORNBY Motor Vehicle Diversity
February 25, 2008
O'HARE v. BOTWICK ME HORNBY Motor Vehicle Diversity
February 7, 2008
DALY v. PELLETIER et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity
September 28, 2007
COSTELLO et al v. DAVIS et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Auto Negligence
August 3, 2007
REARDON et al v. LARKIN et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Auto Negligence
June 5, 2007
KING v. CHRISTIANSEN ME SINGAL Motor Vehicle Diversity-Personal Injury
December 19, 2006
LEAVITT v. DAVE'S AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Wrongful Death
October 19, 2006
BERNSTEIN et al v. POLAND et al ME SINGAL Motor Vehicle Diversity-Auto Negligence
March 21, 2006
AKERSON et al v. FALCON TRANSPORT COMPANY ME KRAVCHUK Motor Vehicle Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
February 22, 2006
CURRAN et al v. RICHARDSON ME KRAVCHUK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Auto Negligence
December 12, 2005
PERRY v. BARAJAS et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Auto Negligence
December 6, 2005
BOUCHARD v. UNITED STATES ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Tort Claim
August 29, 2005
HAUTANIEMI v. USA ME CARTER Motor Vehicle Tort Claim
August 9, 2005
ZUCHARA et al v. BOOTHBY et al ME HORNBY Motor Vehicle Diversity-Auto Negligence
July 26, 2005
HALKETT v. GOLDEN et al ME CARTER Motor Vehicle Diversity-Personal Injury
June 8, 2005
WOLTERSDORF et al v. DESROCHERS et al ME CARTER Motor Vehicle Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
June 6, 2005
PICHE v. NUGENT et al ME KRAVCHUK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Wrongful Death
May 17, 2005
CORMIER et al v. FISHER ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
March 25, 2005
GUERIN v. STULBERGER et al ME SINGAL Motor Vehicle Diversity-Personal Injury
March 4, 2005
SATTERFIELD et al v. USA TRUCK INC ME SINGAL Motor Vehicle Diversity-Personal Injury
January 10, 2005
ROSENDAHL v. BRANGWYNNE ME KRAVCHUK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
December 23, 2004
PRINCE et al v. DAYMARK GROUP INCORPORATED et al ME CARTER Motor Vehicle Diversity-Personal Injury
September 15, 2004
MICHAUD v. PAUL REVERE TRANSPORTATION LLC et al ME CARTER Motor Vehicle Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
April 30, 2004
UNDERWOOD v. JOY et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Wrongful Death
UNDERWOOD v. JOY et al ME WOODCOCK Motor Vehicle Diversity-Wrongful Death
UNDERWOOD v. JOY et al ME HORNBY Motor Vehicle Diversity-Wrongful Death
February 11, 2004
LEVESQUE v. UNITED STATES ME KRAVCHUK Motor Vehicle Tort Claim
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.