Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Trademark Cases filed in the Maryland District Court before Peter J. Messitte [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 15, 2009
Verizon Maryland Inc. et al v. 2Cool Guys.LLC et al MD Messitte Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff: Verizon Maryland Inc., Verizon Trademark Services LLC, Verizon Licensing Company Defendant: 2Cool Guys.LLC, Warren R. Weitzman, Arnold Trebach
 
September 17, 2009
Audi AG et al v. Dodger, LLC et al MD Messitte Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: Audi AG, Audi AG, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Bentley Motors Limited and others... Defendant: Dodger, LLC, Fred Gheyssari, Ryan Mann, Street Dreams Auto Customs, LLC
 
June 4, 2008
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Alexander et al MD Messitte Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company; Defendant: Alex N. Alexander, Nicholas A. Alexander, AO Ventures LLC, Blue Shade, Inc., Servercity, Inc.
 
January 24, 2008
Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Fundstar Financial, LLC MD Messitte Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: Flagstar Bank, FSB; Defendant: Fundstar Financial, LLC
 
February 22, 2006
Sona Laser Centers, Inc. v. Capital Works, LLC et al MD Messitte Trademark Trademark Infringement
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.