Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and



Torts - Injury - Airplane Cases filed in the Maryland District Court [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 20 of 20
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
July 16, 2009
Crim v. U.S. Airways, Inc. MD Nickerson Airplane Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Francis K. Crim Defendant: U.S. Airways, Inc., U.S. Airways, Inc.
 
June 17, 2009
Diamond v. United Air Lines Inc. et al MD Quarles Airplane Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Carole Faye Diamond, Carole Faye Diamond Defendant: United Air Lines Inc., Mesa Airlines, Inc., Travel Guard Group, Inc.
 
June 13, 2008
Moore v. British Airways Public Limited Corporation MD Motz Airplane Federal Question
Plaintiff: Roger Moore; Defendant: British Airways Public Limited Corporation
 
January 17, 2008
Evardo v. Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd. MD Legg Airplane Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Barlan Evardo; Defendant: Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd.
 
November 21, 2007
United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. et al v. USA MD Quarles Airplane Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff: United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc., Air Methods Corporation, Life Net, Inc.; Defendant: United States Of America
 
August 8, 2007
Roseman v. U.S. Airways, Inc. MD Bennett Airplane Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Rosalind R. Roseman; Defendant: U.S. Airways, Inc.
 
April 30, 2007
Godfrey et al v. Granite Construction Company et al MD Quarles Airplane Diversity
Plaintiff: Jonathan Godfrey, Deborah Godfrey; Defendant: Granite Construction Company, Corman Construction, Inc., CG Enterprises, Inc., Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc., American Bridge Company and others...
 
February 21, 2007
Melo-Ferrer v. Cessna Aircraft Company et al MD Titus Airplane Diversity-Airline Crash
Plaintiff: Carlos Melo-Ferrer; Defendant: Cessna Aircraft Company, Cessna Finance Corporation
 
January 22, 2007
Soden v. British Airways, P.L.C. MD Messitte Airplane Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Kimberly Townes Soden; Defendant: British Airways, P.L.C.
 
January 8, 2007
Desmond et al v. Granite Construction Company et al MD Quarles Airplane Diversity
Plaintiff: William T. Desmond, Michael Joseph Schaefer, James Patrick Schaefer, Andrew Kevin Schaefer; Defendant: Granite Construction Company, Corman Construction, Inc., Edward Kraemer & Sons Inc., American Bridge Company, Trumbull Corporation and others...
 
December 22, 2006
Kielar et al v. Granite Construction Company et al MD Quarles Airplane Diversity
July 28, 2006
Brittingham et al v. Collins et al MD Davis Airplane Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
June 16, 2006
Smith v. U.S. Airways, Inc. MD Nickerson Airplane Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
March 29, 2005
Walston v. Southwest Airlines et al MD Day Airplane Diversity-Personal Injury
December 20, 2004
Simmons v. United Air Lines, Inc. MD Davis Airplane Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
November 16, 2004
Clay et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. MD Williams Airplane Diversity-Personal Injury
September 29, 2004
Nieman et al v. Societe Air France MD Blake Airplane Diversity-Personal Injury
May 3, 2004
Fremeau v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. MD Schulze Airplane Notice of Removal
April 20, 2004
LaFleur v. Continental Airlines, Inc. et al MD Bennett Airplane Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
October 17, 2000
Mills, et al v. U.S. Airways, Inc. MD Grimm Airplane Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.