US District Court for the District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,096
Waples v. Warden
as 1:2023cv03368
Petitioner: Aaron Waples
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malley v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv03299
Petitioner: Shawn Christopher Malley
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
El-Bey v. Conaway
as 1:2023cv03268
Petitioner: Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Respondent: Xavier Conaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sterling v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv03229
Petitioner: Gregory David Sterling, Sr.
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv03109
Petitioner: Aaron French
Respondent: William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Dean
as 1:2023cv03108
Petitioner: Rubin Arnaz Collins
Respondent: Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGill v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv03067
Petitioner: Kenneth E. McGill, Jr.
Defendant: Maryland Attorney General
Respondent: Bohrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brice v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv03101
Petitioner: Aaron L. Brice
Respondent: Ronald Webee, Maryland Attorney General and Ronald Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv03023
Petitioner: David C. Andrews
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughan v. Warden
as 1:2023cv03038
Plaintiff: Donald Vaughan and Donald Vaughn
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?