Maryland Real Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Johnson v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marcellus Johnson
Defendant:
Dale H. Dickerson and Sherrie Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jeffries v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, et al.
as 8:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Monica Jeffries
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, et al.
Jeffries v. Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development, et al
as 8:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Monica Jeffries
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
BUTLER v. WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
TRAVON BUTLER
Defendant:
WP MD PROPCO, I, LLC, THE BAINBRIDGE COMPANIES and WP MD Propco I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation et al v. ABP Corporation
as 1:2021cv02658
Plaintiff:
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation and University of Maryland Medical Center, LLC
Defendant:
ABP Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meade Communities, LLC v. Pasten
as 1:2021cv02559
Plaintiff:
Meade Communities, LLC
Defendant:
Kenny B Pasten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Panera, LLC v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02491
Plaintiff:
Panera, LLC
Defendant:
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation and University of Maryland Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meade Communities, LLC v. Jones
as 1:2021cv01976
Plaintiff:
Meade Communities, LLC
Defendant:
Casandra Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meade Communities, LLC v. Ross
as 1:2021cv01973
Plaintiff:
Meade Communities, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meade Communities, LLC v. Gulley
as 1:2021cv01975
Plaintiff:
Meade Communities, LLC
Defendant:
Karmin L Gulley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
