District Court Cases in Maryland
Cases 81 - 90 of 76,666
Ghogomu v. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Maahnchooh Donald Ghogomu
Defendant:
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Dave Forster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Claridy v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
Timothy Claridy
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Officer Keith Gladstone, Unknown Federal Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Fountain v. Salisbury Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Sharon Ann Fountain
Defendant:
Salisbury Police Dept. and Officer Daniel Derasmo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01090
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01121
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stuckey v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01104
Petitioner:
Kai A. Stuckey
Respondent:
R. Shane Weber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morant v. The Warden et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Tavis Davon Morant
Defendant:
The Warden and Officers of the Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Citron, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hendricks
Defendant:
Citron, LLC and Charles Levine
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ifadolere v. Arvina Care Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Adewumi Ifadolere
Defendant:
Arvina Care Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
