US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Cases 21 - 30 of 67,267
Booker v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11062
Plaintiff:
Philip Booker
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campos v. TJX Companies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11067
Plaintiff:
Arlette Campos
Defendant:
TJX Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Burnham v. Colorado Parole Board
as 1:2024cv11056
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Colorado Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demario-Miko v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv11058
Plaintiff:
Devin Demario-Miko
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
IOT INNOVATIONS LLC v. SAVANT SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2024cv11057
Plaintiff:
IOT INNOVATIONS LLC
Defendant:
SAVANT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Porter Jr v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2024cv40061
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Porter Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Kathleen Wenzel and Worcester Recovery Center + Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
