US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Cases 31 - 40 of 67,197
Hernandez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30054
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Steven Tatro, Anthony Pioggia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Aguiar v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv10987
Petitioner:
Stephen Aguiar
Respondent:
Fred Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. v. Civicsmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10999
Plaintiff:
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Defendant:
Civicsmart, Inc. and Duncan Parking Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Pereira v. Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10979
Plaintiff:
Robert Pereira
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC and J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Harding v. Musk
as 1:2024cv10976
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harding v. Amazon.com et al
as 1:2024cv10978
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Amazon.com and Jeff Bezos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wright v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2024cv10985
Plaintiff:
Winston Wright
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boggs v. 34 Bowdoin et al
as 1:2024cv10986
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
34 Bowdoin and Alisa, Mike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
