Massachusetts Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,274
Kiernan Joseph Liebl, Inc. v Indian Farm Estates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11019
Plaintiff:
Kiernan Joseph Liebl, Inc. doing business as Royal Oaks Design, Inc.
Defendant:
Indian Farm Estates, LLC and James Martorilli
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Broden v. Private Business Jets, LLC
as 1:2024cv10880
Plaintiff:
Frederik Broden
Defendant:
Private Business Jets, L.L.C. doing business as FlyPrivate
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
OTTO Archive LLC v. Byrne
as 1:2024cv10892
Plaintiff:
OTTO Archive LLC
Defendant:
Michael Byrne
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Broden v. Private Business Jets, LLC
as 1:2024cv10872
Plaintiff:
Frederik Broden
Defendant:
Private Business Jets, L.L.C. doing business as FlyPrivate
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Broden v. Private Business Jets, LLC
as 1:2024cv10873
Plaintiff:
Frederik Broden
Defendant:
Private Business Jets, L.L.C. doing business as FlyPrivate
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10754
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10752
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10756
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10750
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10749
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
