Massachusetts Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Anthony & Enzo Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv14216
Plaintiff:
Anthony & Enzo Inc. and F/V Princess Elena Inc.
Defendant:
Penny Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Chen v. Restaurant Depot, LLC
as 1:2015cv14136
Plaintiff:
Wu Chen
Defendant:
Restaurant Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solomon v. Wolf et al
as 1:2015cv13393
Plaintiff:
Dennis Solomon
Defendant:
Douglas Wolf, David Gesner, Vincent LeClerc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Baldinelli v. Benuck & Rainey, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13424
Plaintiff:
Eunice Baldinelli
Defendant:
Benuck & Rainey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Boost Software Inc. v. AVG TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
as 1:2014cv14158
Plaintiff:
Boost Software Inc.
Defendant:
AVG Technologies USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mayflower Transit, LLC. v. Crest Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv40034
Plaintiff:
Mayflower Transit, LLC.
Defendant:
Crest Technologies, Inc. and Hartford Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Crest Technologies, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Crest Technologies, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Mayflower Transit, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United Van Lines, LLC v. Ghiatis et al
as 4:2013cv11460
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Ashley Ghiatis and Patricia A Ghiatis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
United Van Lines, LLC v. Ghiatis et al
as 1:2013cv11460
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Ashley Ghiatis and Patricia A Ghiatis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Paul Jones v. Client Services, Inc
as 1:2013cv11274
Defendant:
Client Services, Inc
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11277
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
