Massachusetts Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,213
Harding v. SpaceX et al
as 1:2024cv10977
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
SpaceX and Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pope v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10980
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jabir Pope
Defendant:
City of Boston, Peter J. O'Malley, James T. Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. Feds Agents et al
as 1:2024cv10982
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Feds Agents, Bureau of Investigation and Patrol State Trooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Range Rover et al
as 1:2024cv10983
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Range Rover and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30054
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Steven Tatro, Anthony Pioggia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. 34 Bowdoin et al
as 1:2024cv10986
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
34 Bowdoin and Alisa, Mike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Children Hospital
as 1:2024cv10984
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Children Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stoops v. No Defendants
as 1:2024cv10957
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J. Stoops
Defendant:
No Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hamilton McKeon v. U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 1:2024cv10933
Plaintiff:
Megan Hamilton McKeon
Defendant:
U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sorrentino v. Massachusetts Contributory Retirement Appeal Board et al
as 1:2024cv10944
Plaintiff:
John Sorrentino
Defendant:
Massachusetts Contributory Retirement Appeal Board and Massachusetts State Board of Retirement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
