District Court Cases in Massachusetts
Cases 41 - 50 of 67,217
Sport Pro Surfacing, LLC v. Flake et al
as 1:2024cv11000
Plaintiff:
Sport Pro Surfacing, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth Flake, RFC Finishes, LLC, Peter Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Harding v. Google, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10991
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kersey v. Trump
as 1:2024cv10993
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCammon et al v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv10996
Plaintiff:
Taylor McCammon and Kelly McCammon
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jasperson et al v. Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc..
as 1:2024cv11003
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jasperson, Albert Waddington and Dina Crocetto-Waddington
Defendant:
Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc..
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Harding v. SpaceX et al
as 1:2024cv10977
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
SpaceX and Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pope v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10980
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jabir Pope
Defendant:
City of Boston, Peter J. O'Malley, James T. Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. Feds Agents et al
as 1:2024cv10982
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Feds Agents, Bureau of Investigation and Patrol State Trooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Range Rover et al
as 1:2024cv10983
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Range Rover and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30054
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Steven Tatro, Anthony Pioggia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
