US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,370
Michigan Health and Wellness Center, LLC v. Royal Oak Township
as 2:2024cv10749
Plaintiff:
Michigan Health and Wellness Center, LLC
Defendant:
Royal Oak Township
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor v. Moore et al
as 4:2024cv10739
Plaintiff:
Camille Taylor
Defendant:
Shanita Moore, Michael Cardenas and Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oguejiofor et al v. Bank of America Corporation
as 5:2024cv10741
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma Oguejiofor and Chunco Investments
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Duboise v. Piazza
as 2:2024cv10706
Plaintiff:
Donnie L. Duboise
Defendant:
Officer Piazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brower v. Roose et al
as 2:2024cv10702
Plaintiff:
Malcom Brower
Defendant:
Erica Roose and Edward Rose Village Apartments, LLC Doing business as Charter Oaks Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Heath v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv10682
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Heath
Defendant:
Adrian Anderson, Gary Charles Cole, Jr. and Oscoda County of
Glenn v. Kraszewski et al
as 2:2024cv10665
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Glenn, III
Defendant:
Aaron Kraszewski and Detroit, City of
Lee v. Forman
as 2:2024cv10678
Plaintiff:
Carmen I Lee
Defendant:
M Forman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linderman v. Oscoda Charter Township et al
as 1:2024cv10674
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Linderman
Defendant:
Oscoda Charter Township and Tammy Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lima Township Residents et al v. Lima Township Board et al
as 2:2024cv10666
Plaintiff:
Lima Township Residents and Citizens of Lima for Cannabis
Defendant:
Lima Township Board, Duane Luick, Nanette Havens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
